30 Eylül 2012 Pazar

Farewell to Courier Express and Postal Observer

To contact us Click HERE


Please see the Sept. 19 update, Courier Express and Postal Observer Lives Again.

In messages to his Twitter followers last night, respected postal commentator Alan Robinson announced that he will be shutting down his Courier Express and Postal Observer blog tomorrow.

"Courier Express and Postal Observer will come to end on September 15th as I am not renewing my hosting agreement," he wrote. "Wish everyone who works on #USPS issues well as I am done for now. I have to take care of myself and writing takes too much time."

"I love writing but I cared too much about readers and not myself; I dug a hole worse than usps," he explained to one follower. "I'm also very frustrating watching the USPS constrict itself as that is what can pass Congress; makes no business sense."

It's fitting that his (apparently) last article for the blog shows that "the House is unlikely to tackle any significant legislation before the end of the fiscal year." It's vintage Alan, digging into the dry details of government and using his extensive knowledge and contacts to tell us what it all means.

Also vintage Alan was his Twitter exchange yesterday with Rep. Dennis Ross, an influential Florida Republican, about the battle between the Tampa Bay Rays and Alan's beloved Orioles. Alan managed not to gloat too much when the Orioles pulled out a victory in the 14th inning.

The blog describes Alan as "Executive Director of the Center for the Study of the Postal Market, is editor of the Postal Journal, and President of Direct Communications Group. In the few hours of the day he isn’t thinking about the postal market, he enjoys listening to the Baltimore Orioles baseball games as it appears that the day has come that they will finish the season with a winning record."

He also advocates for research funds and better education regarding digestive diseases and oral cancer.

Some people consider me a postal expert, but I'm an amateur in comparison with Alan. I will miss his blog and have invited him to write guest articles for Dead Tree Edition if the writing and commenting bug ever hits him again.

What's the Future for the Paper Industry? Depends

To contact us Click HERE
The paper market's long-term decline has now spread to the fictional Dunder Mifflin Paper Company: "The Office" had the worst premiere in its nine-year history last night.

The episode had the show's second-lowest audience ever, attracting "just 4.32 million viewers, down 46 percent among 18–49-year-olds from its premiere last year," reports Vulture.com. In other words, the once-hot comedy centered around a dysfunctional paper company (Aren't they all dysfunctional?) is dropping as fast as newsprint demand.

It's not just newsprint that's shaky. A deal to restart the NewPage supercalendered machine in Port Hawkesbury, Nova Scotia fell through today (Sept. 22 update: and then was resurrected); its shaky status means that North America's only world-class, magazine-quality paper machine is in danger of being shipped to another continent or scrapped. And North America's second-largest player in the magazine category (Verso Paper) is at a competitive disadvantage not because it may be on the verge of bankruptcy reorganization but because several competitors have already been through or are in the Chapter 11 debt-cleansing process.

Declining demand means fewer paper machines are needed, but fortunately some of the idled machines are being put to good use. Several that once made copy paper have been converted recently to producing fluff pulp, the main ingredient in diapers.

Here's how to understand the trends: The bad news for pulp and paper companies is that Baby Boomers are reaching senior-citizen status, leaving fewer dinosaurs in the workplace who still print out their emails to read them. The good news is that the aging of the Baby Boom means more people on the continent are incontinent, which is boosting demand for hygiene products that rely on fluff pulp.

Related articles:
  • Under Siege: The Outlook for Print Media Is Even Worse Than We Thought, Expert Says -- But Publishers May Prosper  
  • A Glimmer of Hope for the Port Hawkesbury Mill  
  • Verso Changes Course -- Why?

Going Paperless Doesn't Mean Going Green, The New York Times Proves

To contact us Click HERE
Perhaps we can finally say goodbye to those simplistic "Go green, go paperless" promotional campaigns.

There's nothing particularly green about the massive data centers that store the internet's data, The New York Times revealed this past weekend after in-depth investigation. Data centers waste electricity and spew pollutants in a way that "is sharply at odds with its [the information industry's] image of sleek efficiency and environmental friendliness," the lengthy but clearly written "Power, Pollution, and the Internet" says.

"The industry has long argued that computerizing business transactions and everyday tasks like banking and reading library books has the net effect of saving energy and resources." But data centers use more electricity than the paper industry, according to the The Times.

Among other highlights of the article:
  • "Most data centers, by design, consume vast amounts of energy in an incongruously wasteful manner, interviews and documents show. Online companies typically run their facilities at maximum capacity around the clock, whatever the demand."
  • "The pollution from data centers has increasingly been cited by the authorities for violating clean air regulations, documents show. In Silicon Valley, many data centers appear on the state government’s Toxic Air Contaminant Inventory, a roster of the area’s top stationary diesel polluters."
  • Data centers use "only 6 percent to 12 percent of the electricity powering their servers to perform computations. The rest was essentially used to keep servers idling and ready in case of a surge in activity that could slow or crash their operations."
  • Most of the data are created by consumers. "With no sense that data is physical or that storing it uses up space and energy, those consumers have developed the habit of sending huge data files back and forth, like videos and mass e-mails with photo attachments."
Related articles:  
  • OK, Johnny, Now Greenwash Your Hands  
  • 10 Questions About Toshiba's No-Print Day
  • Google Using Blatant Greenwash To Promote New Catalog App  
  • Newspapers Are Greener Than Web News, Says Environmental Expert 
  • Smackdown: Printed Editions vs. Digital Editions  
  • Environmental Impact of Paper Goes Way Beyond Cutting Trees

Redrawing the Map: A Look at USPS' Network Rationalization Plan

To contact us Click HERE
The U.S. Postal Service has been consolidating its mail-processing operations for several years, but it wasn't until I saw a recent postal official's presentation that I realized even more dramatic changes may be ahead.
The USPS's Network Rationalization Plan, opposed by some postal unions and not-in-my-district Congress members, would cut the number of processing centers nearly in half by 2015 -- from 461 this year to 232 in 2015. That's down from 673 in  2006 and 599 in 2009. (See also Has USPS Targeted the Wrong Plants for Closure?.) 
As the maps below show, the impact would be especially dramatic in certain regions. Several states -- including Mississippi, Kansas, and Arizona -- would go from having six or more facilities to only one.



 


Note the plan's radical effect on states in and near the northern Rocky Mountains. Some of the centers targeted for closure are more than 300 miles from the nearest surviving facility, leaving some postal workers no way to continue working for the USPS without relocating.


Northern Rockies: Currently
Northern Rockies: "After"











It's not just sparsely populated areas that would lose most of their processing centers. Note the plan's impact on Ohio and southwestern Pennsylvania. And West Virginia, which had 11 centers barely two years ago, would be left with only Charleston.

Ohio Valley: "After"
Ohio Valley: Currently










Declining mail volume, increased automation, and revised service standards have meant the Postal Services needs fewer locations that can sort mail. The use of Flats Sequencing System (FSS) machines has tended to cause even more consolidation of processing into huge distribution centers, some of which have 2,000 employees (versus as few as 50 in the kinds of small centers that are typically targeted for closure).

Related articles: 
  • USPS 'Honors' Sen. Byrd With Plant Consolidations
  • Death of the SCF, Part 3: Flats Sequencing
  • USPS Steps Up Mail-Processing Consolidation

Has USPS Targeted the Wrong Plants for Closure?

To contact us Click HERE
The U.S. Postal Service's plan to reduce its mail-processing network by half has a major flaw, according to a Postal Regulatory Commission opinion released Friday: The plan would tend "to move processing assignments from more productive plants to less productive plants."

USPS goofed in assuming that consolidating mail sorting into larger plants would improve productivity, according to the PRC's advisory opinion on the Postal Service's ambitious Network Rationalization plan. In fact, larger plants historically have tended to process fewer mail pieces per workhour than smaller ones, the PRC's analysis finds.

"Shifting volume from less productive to more productive plants, without changing operating windows or service standards, would increase productivity by 18 percent, and save $1.3 billion in direct mail processing costs," the ruling says.

That's more than the $968 million USPS projects that its plan will save in mail-processing costs, and the PRC believes that projection is overly optimistic because of questionable assumptions.

In theory, large plants have the advantage of more automation, such as the football-field-sized Flats Sequencing System machines. But FSS has been mostly a disappointment so far (and may actually decrease productivity in mail sortation). The PRC finds that large plants are inherently less efficient because of the greater distances involved in moving mail from one stage to another.

How much idle time?
A key point of disagreement is USPS's claim that 27% "of workhours within automated, mechanized, and manual processing are spent waiting for the mail." The PRC says the number is only 1% to 4%. The Postal Service envisions consolidation leading to huge productivity gains by eliminating such idle time, but the commission questions whether the surviving plants will really be able to work the mail far more efficiently than they do today.

"To simply restore mail processing costs to FY 2010 levels, the set of plants surviving after reconfiguration will have to increase their productivity by an average of 8.4 percent above the productivitiesthat they achieved in FY 2010," the ruling says. "Further, the Postal Service will have to increase the average productivity of all plants in the network by 20.4 percent to achieve the level of savings that it expects."

USPS projects its plan will save a total of $2.1 billion annually, with much of the savings coming from transportation and from reduced delivery standards -- that is, longer lead times for delivering mail.The PRC agrees that network consolidation makes sense, but it thinks USPS's savings estimate is too high and that it may be underestimating the revenue that will be lost if service standards are lowered.

Concluded PRC chairman Ruth Goldway, "I strongly believe that the information the Commission has developed is so persuasive that once it is carefully studied by the Postal Service and the mailing community, the Postal Service will utilize it, implementing a rationalization plan that saves costs while preserving service."

Related articles:
  • Redrawing the Map: A Look at USPS' Network Rationalization Plan By the way, I had no idea when I published this that the PRC decision would be coming out less than 24 hours later. 
  • Postal Watchdogs Trying to Unleash USPS Innovation  
  • Postal Service Has Too Many Employees and Pays Them Too Much, Mailer Groups Say

29 Eylül 2012 Cumartesi

Courier Express and Postal Observer Lives Again

To contact us Click HERE
After announcing last week it would shut down and going offline for a few days, respected postal blog Courier Express and Postal Observer is back in business.

"The outpouring of support made me realize that I could not stop," publisher Alan Robinson told Dead Tree Edition today.

The blog came back to life yesterday with an in-depth look at FedEx's latest quarterly earnings report, which noted that the private carrier has become more reliant on the U.S. Postal Service to deliver its parcels. That kind of original, spin-free analysis makes Alan's work so important at a time when everyone has an opinion about USPS (and they're usually shaped by the mainstream media's uninformed reporting or by political half truths).

Welcome back, Alan.

Environmental Impact of Paper Goes Way Beyond Cutting Trees

To contact us Click HERE
Almost any discussion of paper manufacturing's environmental impact focuses on cutting trees and protecting forests. But five news reports in the past week provide a reminder of other environmental issues surrounding paper making:

  • An Environmental Protection Agency study of a former paper Montana paper mill found “potentially dangerous levels of dioxins, heavy metals and other hazardous chemicals,” according to the Missoulian. The results could lead to the former Smurfit Stone property becoming a Superfund site, as well as concerns about what would happen if a levee on the property failed.
  • The site of an abandoned paper mill in Tennessee has been proposed as a Superfund site because of PCB and dioxin contamination. 
  • A trial began this week on charges that a lawyer duped buyers of a New York paper mill by not disclosing it had been declared a Superfund site. (Are you noticing a pattern here?) 
  • International Paper received regulatory approval for an extensive upgrade of the wastewater treatment plant at its Bogalusa, LA mill. A failure of the plant under previous ownership last year caused a discharge of black liquor, an especially nasty and infamous pulp byproduct, killing hundreds of thousands of fish and fouling the Pearl River. 
  • A power outage last week at a Glatfelter mill in Pennsylvania caused the release of 6,000 gallons of pulp and contaminated water into a nearby stream. 
Regardless of how it sources its fiber, can a paper company be considered green if it fouls waterways, spews high levels of toxins and greenhouse gases into the air, uses carcinogenic additives, or reveals as little as possible about its environmental impact? No, not when there are competitors using best practices to minimize emissions, operating mills that are nearly carbon neutral, switching to safer materials, and going way beyond what the law requires in reporting their environmental practices and measurements.

Related articles:
  • What Exactly Is Environmentally Preferable Paper?
  • What Nasty Chemicals Are Lurking in Your Paper?  
  • Three, or Maybe Four, Green Magazine Pioneers  
  • Ecologomania and Printed Products

What's the Future for the Paper Industry? Depends

To contact us Click HERE
The paper market's long-term decline has now spread to the fictional Dunder Mifflin Paper Company: "The Office" had the worst premiere in its nine-year history last night.

The episode had the show's second-lowest audience ever, attracting "just 4.32 million viewers, down 46 percent among 18–49-year-olds from its premiere last year," reports Vulture.com. In other words, the once-hot comedy centered around a dysfunctional paper company (Aren't they all dysfunctional?) is dropping as fast as newsprint demand.

It's not just newsprint that's shaky. A deal to restart the NewPage supercalendered machine in Port Hawkesbury, Nova Scotia fell through today (Sept. 22 update: and then was resurrected); its shaky status means that North America's only world-class, magazine-quality paper machine is in danger of being shipped to another continent or scrapped. And North America's second-largest player in the magazine category (Verso Paper) is at a competitive disadvantage not because it may be on the verge of bankruptcy reorganization but because several competitors have already been through or are in the Chapter 11 debt-cleansing process.

Declining demand means fewer paper machines are needed, but fortunately some of the idled machines are being put to good use. Several that once made copy paper have been converted recently to producing fluff pulp, the main ingredient in diapers.

Here's how to understand the trends: The bad news for pulp and paper companies is that Baby Boomers are reaching senior-citizen status, leaving fewer dinosaurs in the workplace who still print out their emails to read them. The good news is that the aging of the Baby Boom means more people on the continent are incontinent, which is boosting demand for hygiene products that rely on fluff pulp.

Related articles:
  • Under Siege: The Outlook for Print Media Is Even Worse Than We Thought, Expert Says -- But Publishers May Prosper  
  • A Glimmer of Hope for the Port Hawkesbury Mill  
  • Verso Changes Course -- Why?

Going Paperless Doesn't Mean Going Green, The New York Times Proves

To contact us Click HERE
Perhaps we can finally say goodbye to those simplistic "Go green, go paperless" promotional campaigns.

There's nothing particularly green about the massive data centers that store the internet's data, The New York Times revealed this past weekend after in-depth investigation. Data centers waste electricity and spew pollutants in a way that "is sharply at odds with its [the information industry's] image of sleek efficiency and environmental friendliness," the lengthy but clearly written "Power, Pollution, and the Internet" says.

"The industry has long argued that computerizing business transactions and everyday tasks like banking and reading library books has the net effect of saving energy and resources." But data centers use more electricity than the paper industry, according to the The Times.

Among other highlights of the article:
  • "Most data centers, by design, consume vast amounts of energy in an incongruously wasteful manner, interviews and documents show. Online companies typically run their facilities at maximum capacity around the clock, whatever the demand."
  • "The pollution from data centers has increasingly been cited by the authorities for violating clean air regulations, documents show. In Silicon Valley, many data centers appear on the state government’s Toxic Air Contaminant Inventory, a roster of the area’s top stationary diesel polluters."
  • Data centers use "only 6 percent to 12 percent of the electricity powering their servers to perform computations. The rest was essentially used to keep servers idling and ready in case of a surge in activity that could slow or crash their operations."
  • Most of the data are created by consumers. "With no sense that data is physical or that storing it uses up space and energy, those consumers have developed the habit of sending huge data files back and forth, like videos and mass e-mails with photo attachments."
Related articles:  
  • OK, Johnny, Now Greenwash Your Hands  
  • 10 Questions About Toshiba's No-Print Day
  • Google Using Blatant Greenwash To Promote New Catalog App  
  • Newspapers Are Greener Than Web News, Says Environmental Expert 
  • Smackdown: Printed Editions vs. Digital Editions  
  • Environmental Impact of Paper Goes Way Beyond Cutting Trees

Redrawing the Map: A Look at USPS' Network Rationalization Plan

To contact us Click HERE
The U.S. Postal Service has been consolidating its mail-processing operations for several years, but it wasn't until I saw a recent postal official's presentation that I realized even more dramatic changes may be ahead.
The USPS's Network Rationalization Plan, opposed by some postal unions and not-in-my-district Congress members, would cut the number of processing centers nearly in half by 2015 -- from 461 this year to 232 in 2015. That's down from 673 in  2006 and 599 in 2009.
As the maps below show, the impact would be especially dramatic in certain regions. Several states -- including Mississippi, Kansas, and Arizona -- would go from having six or more facilities to only one.



 


Note the plan's radical effect on states in and near the northern Rocky Mountains. Some of the centers targeted for closure are more than 300 miles from the nearest surviving facility, leaving some postal workers no way to continue working for the USPS without relocating.


Northern Rockies: Currently
Northern Rockies: "After"











It's not just sparsely populated areas that would lose most of their processing centers. Note the plan's impact on Ohio and southwestern Pennsylvania. And West Virginia, which had 11 centers barely two years ago, would be left with only Charleston.

Ohio Valley: "After"
Ohio Valley: Currently










Declining mail volume, increased automation, and revised service standards have meant the Postal Services needs fewer locations that can sort mail. The use of Flats Sequencing System (FSS) machines has tended to cause even more consolidation of processing into huge distribution centers, some of which have 2,000 employees (versus as few as 50 in the kinds of small centers that are typically targeted for closure).

Related articles: 
  • USPS 'Honors' Sen. Byrd With Plant Consolidations
  • Death of the SCF, Part 3: Flats Sequencing
  • USPS Steps Up Mail-Processing Consolidation

28 Eylül 2012 Cuma

Bad Guys Hate Romney Jerusalem Speech

To contact us Click HERE
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021043464 (pro-palestine)
Romney Jerusalem remarks 'harm US interests': Palestinians 

US presidential hopeful Mitt Romney's endorsement of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel is "harmful" to US interests in the Middle East, a senior Palestinian official said on Sunday. 

"Romney's declarations are harmful to American interests in our region, and they harm peace, security and stability," Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erakat told AFP. 

"Even if this statement is within the US election campaign, it is unacceptable and we completely reject it. The US election campaign should never be at the expense of the Palestinians," he said. 

"Romney is rewarding occupation, settlement and extremism in the region with such declarations." 



Worse Than London: Romney's Reckless Remarks In Jerusalem

(left wing anti-republican pro-arab)

www.nationalmemo.com/worse-than-london-romneys-reckless...Share15 hours ago – But it was Romney himself who suggested — in a speech that skirted violating ... from almost any American politician, Republican or Democrat.While Mitt Romney’s boorish remarks about the Olympics in London were humiliating enough, the comments emanating from him and his campaign in Israel were still more embarrassing – and potentially more damaging, too.Seeking to consolidate support on the religious far right, both Christian and Jewish, the Republican candidate and his chief foreign policy surrogate confirmed their ideological obedience in the most abject fashion possible. Without articulating a real policy, their statements reflected such complete submission to neoconservative ideology that even the Bush administration appears moderate by contrast. That they would do so within hours of a high-dollar fundraising event in Jerusalem, attended by major right-wing donors such as Sheldon Adelson, added a jarringly mercenary tone to their reckless words.Dan Senor, the former Bush administration spokesman in Baghdad who now serves as Romney’s senior foreign policy advisor, startled reporters on Sunday when he promised the most hawkish Israelis a free hand to mount a military attack against Iran. “If Israel has to take action on its own, in order to stop Iran from developing that capability, the governor would respect that decision,” said Senor during a briefing that preceded Romney’s address in Jerusalem. The predicate for such an attack, according to Senor, would not be Iran’s development of a nuclear weapon, but its attainment of the capacity to do so.



Romney slams Obama: Public diplomatic distance emboldens ...

(Haaretz = anti-Israel Israeli paper)

www.haaretz.com/.../romney-slams-obama-public-diplomatic-...Share1 day ago – In Jerusalem speech, it was Romney's voice but Netanyahu's words ...his Democratic rival during his speech in Jerusalem on Sunday, saying ...Contrary to his promise not to criticize the U.S. president on foreign soil, Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney slammed his Democratic rival during his speech in Jerusalem on Sunday, saying public expressions of diplomatic distance is damaging to Israel."Diplomatic distance that is public and critical emboldens Israel's adversaries," said Romney, alluding to the Obama administration's stance on Israel.Romney's speech followed a day spent meeting Israel's leaders on his official visit to the country. Joining the crowd was billionaire Sheldon Adelson, who has donated millions of dollars to Romney's campaign, and those of other Republicans.Romney opened his speech by saying it was a "moving experience to be in Jerusalem," which he described as, "Israel's capital."He went on to mention the U.S.-Israeli relationship, saying, "We serve the same cause and we have the same enemies. The security of Israel is a national security interest of the United States."http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/diplomania/in-jerusalem-speech-it-was-romney-s-voice-but-netanyahu-s-words.premium-1.454521

In Jerusalem speech, it was Romney's voice but Netanyahu's words

Netanyahu embraces Romney as no Israeli prime minister has ever before embraced a candidate running against an incumbent U.S. president.

By Barak Ravid | 02:03 30.07.12 |  21Romney's staff picked the 150 guests carefully.  Religious American immigrants dominated the crowd; secular Jews and native-born Israelis were few and far between. Those present included Jewish-American millionaires, settler leaders like the former chairman of the Yesha Council of settlements Israel Harel, and former Netanyahu aides such as Dore Gold, Naftali Bennett, Ayelet Shaked and Yoaz Hendel.The full text is available for Haaretz subscribers.
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/30/romney-comments-on-palestinians-draw-criticism/

Romney Comments on Palestinians Draw Criticism

By ASHLEY PARKER
3:12 p.m. | Updated JERUSALEM — Mitt Romney found himself on the defensive yet again on his overseas trip, this time after offending Palestinianleaders with comments he made at a breakfast fund-raiser here on Monday.Speaking to roughly four dozen donors at the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, Mr. Romney suggested that cultural differences between the Israelis and the Palestinians were the reason the Israelis were so much more economically successful than the Palestinians, without mentioning the impact that deep trade restrictions imposed by the Israeli government have had on the Palestinian economy. He also vastly understated the income disparities between the two groups.“As you come here and you see the G.D.P. per capita, for instance, in Israel which is about $21,000, and compare that with the G.D.P. per capita just across the areas managed by the Palestinian Authority, which is more like $10,000 per capita, you notice such a dramatically stark difference in economic vitality,” he said.In an interview with the Associated Press, Saeb Erekat, a senior aide to President Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestinian Authority, called Mr. Romney’s remarks “racist.”
http://newamericamedia.org/2012/07/mitt-romneys-jerusalem-speech-panders-to-the-right-wing.php (pro-palestine, pro-Iran)

Mitt Romney’s Jerusalem Speech Panders to the Right-Wing

 Mitt Romney’s Jerusalem Speech Panders to the Right-Wing

Story tools

CommentsAAAResizePrintShare and EmailNew America Media, Op-ed, William O. Beeman, (pro-Iranian, pro-Obama, anti-israel) Posted: Jul 30, 2012
Netanyahu as villian? Mitt Romney’s foreign policy speech to the Jerusalem Foundation in Israel on Sunday
qualified him to be President—of Israel. His observations were as remarkable for what he didn’t say as for what he did. They could have been written by Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, for they parallel his thinking almost exactly, and they were Supports Obama's frenemy israel policy? sharply at odds with current U.S. [anti-Israel pro-Palestine] policy toward the region. 
Mr. Romney didn’t mention the Palestinians (although he later made an invidious comparison of Palestinians to Israelis that was deemed racist by Palestinian officials), nor did he offer any remarks on the settlements in the West Bank—arguably Israel’s most pressing problem. Indeed, he explicitly called for Americans not to engage in any criticism of Israel at all, since Israelis seemed to be capable of self-critique.Apologizing for Iranian holocaust deniers?? He said, “When Iran’s leaders deny the Holocaust . . .” branding them as Holocaust deniers. Iran’s leaders, in fact, have never denied the Holocaust. To be sure, they have questioned its causes and results in ways that are inaccurate, but they never denied that it happened. Supporting Iran's nuclear program? Mr. Romney hinted broadly that the United States would support a military strike against Iran. This would not be to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon as is current U.S. policy, but rather to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapons capacity. This is code for shutting down or destroying Iran’s entire nuclear development program.

Romney's Inspirational Jersualem Speech You'll Never Hear From Obama

To contact us Click HERE
Mitt Romney Jerusalem Speech Transcript 7-29-12
Maggie's Notebook ^ | 7-29-12 | Maggie@MaggiesNotebook 
Posted on Mon Jul 30 2012 14:40:16 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) by maggiesnotebookThe following is the transcript of a brilliant and inspiring speech by Mitt Romney from Jerusalem's Old City. I see only one word missing..."Palestinians," although they and the evil they perpetrate is clear. He reiterates that Jerusalem is the Capital City of Israel; that our ideals and values are much the same; that America will not stand by and watch horror played out again; that true peacemakers never allow despotic regimes to spread their hate to free peoples; that we have a solemn duty to believe Iran when they tell us they will destroy Israel [and the U.S.]; that the people of Israel are among our "dear friends," and that we both cherish free enterprise, and millions in the Middle East would cherish the same if they had the opportunity.He mentions the athletes and coaches who died in the 1972 Munich Olympic attack 40 years ago, by Palestinians known as Black September. Did you know that the day after those murders, the Olympics were shut down for that day and flags of all countries were flown at half mast - EXCEPT the flags of Arab countries, which continued to fly high with heinous pride?Barack Obama still has not set foot inside Israel during his Presidency. He has ushered Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in through a side door of the White House, walked out of White House meetings with him - leaving him and his staff in a Conference Room, and embraced nothing of Israel except his own false rhetoric. Obama has been to the Middle East numerous times - but never to Israel. UPDATE: Romney also made the point that an Islamist is now running Egypt. Two thumbs up for calling the ruler what he is.I urge all American Jews to vote for Mitt Romney, especially those of you in Florida, Ohio, Nevada and Pennsylvania. Get out the vote for him if you can. Donate to him if you can. [All emphasis in the text below is mine.]Pullout Quote:
By history and by conviction, our two countries are bound together. No individual, no nation, no world organization, will pry us apart. And as long as we stay together and stand together, there is no threat we cannot overcome and very little that we cannot achieve. ~ Mitt Romney in Israel 7-29-12
Begin transcript of Mitt Romney's speech in Jerusalem's Old City, July 29, 2012Thank you for that kind introduction, Mayor Barkat, and thank you all for that warm welcome. It's a pleasure and a privilege to be in Israel again.To step foot into Israel is to step foot into a nation that began with an ancient promise made in this land. The Jewish people persisted through one of the most monstrous crimes in human history, and now this nation has come to take its place among the most impressive democracies on earth. Israel's achievements are a wonder of the modern world.These achievements are a tribute to the resilience of the Israeli people. You have managed, against all odds, time and again throughout your history, to persevere, to rise up, and to emerge stronger.The historian Paul Johnson, writing on the 50th anniversary of the creation of the Jewish state, said that over the course of Israel's life, 100 completely new independent states had come into existence. "Israel is the only one whose creation can fairly be called a miracle," Johnson wrote.It is a deeply moving experience to be in Jerusalem, the capital of Israel.Our two nations are separated by more than 5,000 miles. But for an American abroad, you can't get much closer to the ideals and convictions of my own country than you do in Israel. We're part of the great fellowship of democracies. We speak the same language of freedom and justice, and the right of every person to live in peace. We serve the same cause and provoke the same hatreds in the same enemies of civilization.It is my firm conviction that the security of Israel is in the vital national security interest of the United States. And ours is an alliance based not only on shared interests but also on enduring shared values.In those shared values, one of the strongest voices is that of your prime minister, my friend Benjamin Netanyahu. I met with him earlier this morning and I look forward to my family joining his this evening as they observe the close of this fast day of Tisha B'Av.It's remarkable to consider how much adversity, over so great a span of time, is recalled by just one day on the calendar. This is a day of remembrance and mourning, but like other such occasions, it also calls forth clarity and resolve.At this time, we also remember the 11 Israeli athletes and coaches who were massacred at the Munich Olympics forty years ago. Ten years ago this week, 9 Israeli and American students were murdered in the terrorist attack at Hebrew University. And tragedies like these are not reserved to the past. They are a constant reminder of the reality of hate, and the will with which it is executed upon the innocent.It was Menachem Begin who said this about the Ninth of the month of Av: "We remember that day," he said, "and now have the responsibility to make sure that never again will our independence be destroyed and never again will the Jew become homeless or defenseless." "This," Prime Minister Begin added, "is the crux of the problems facing us in the future."So it is today, as Israel faces enemies who deny past crimes against the Jewish people and seek to commit new ones.When Iran's leaders deny the Holocaust or speak of wiping this nation off the map, only the naïve - or worse - will dismiss it as an excess of rhetoric. Make no mistake: the ayatollahs in Tehran are testing our moral defenses. They want to know who will object, and who will look the other way.My message to the people of Israel and the leaders of Iran is one and the same: I will not look away; and neither will my country. As Prime Minister Begin put it, in vivid and haunting words, "if an enemy of [the Jewish] people says he seeks to destroy us, believe him."We have seen the horrors of history. We will not stand by. We will not watch them play out again.It would be foolish not to take Iran's leaders at their word. They are, after all, the product of a radical theocracy.Over the years Iran has amassed a bloody and brutal record. It has seized embassies, targeted diplomats, and killed its own people. It supports the ruthless Assad regime in Syria. They have provided weapons that have killed American soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq. It has plotted to assassinate diplomats on American soil. It is Iran that is the leading state sponsor of terrorism and the most destabilizing nation in the world.We have a solemn duty and a moral imperative to deny Iran's leaders the means to follow through on their malevolent intentions.We should stand with all who would join our effort to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran - and that includes Iranian dissidents. Do not erase from your memory the scenes from three years ago, when that regime brought death to its own people as they rose up. The threat we face does not come from the Iranian people, but from the regime that oppresses them.Five years ago, at the Herzliya Conference, I stated my view that Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons capability presents an intolerable threat to Israel, to America, and to the world. That threat has only become worse.Now as then, the regime's claims that it seeks to enrich nuclear material for peaceful purposes are belied by years of malign deceptions.Now as then, the conduct of Iran's leaders gives us no reason to trust them with nuclear material.But today, the regime in Iran is five years closer to developing nuclear weapons capability. Preventing that outcome must be our highest national security priority. I want to pause on this last point. It is sometimes said that those who are the most committed to stopping the Iranian regime from securing nuclear weapons are reckless and provocative and inviting war.The opposite is true. We are the true peacemakers. History teaches with force and clarity that when the world's most despotic regimes secure the world's most destructive weapons, peace often gives way to oppression, to violence, or to devastating war.We must not delude ourselves into thinking that containment is an option. We must lead the effort to prevent Iran from building and possessing nuclear weapons capability. We should employ any and all measures to dissuade the Iranian regime from its nuclear course, and it is our fervent hope that diplomatic and economic measures will do so. In the final analysis, of course, no option should be excluded. We recognize Israel's right to defend itself, and that it is right for America to stand with you.These are some of the principles I first outlined five years ago. What was timely then has become urgent today.Let me turn from Iran to other nations in the Middle East, where we have seen rising tumult and chaos. To the north, Syria is on the brink of a civil war. The dictator in Damascus, no friend to Israel and no friend to America, slaughters his own people as he desperately clings to power.Your other neighbor to the north, Lebanon, is under the growing and dangerous influence of Hezbollah.After a year of upheaval and unrest, Egypt now has an Islamist President, chosen in a democratic election. Hopefully, this new government understands that one true measure of democracy is how those elected by the majority respect the rights of those in the minority. The international community must use its considerable influence to ensure that the new government honors the peace agreement with Israel that was signed by the government of Anwar Sadat.As you know only too well, since Hamas took control of the Gaza Strip in 2007, thousands of rockets have rained on Israeli homes and cities. I have walked on the streets of Sderot, and honor the resolve of its people. And now, new attacks have been launched from the Sinai Peninsula.With Hezbollah rockets aimed at Israel from the north, and Hamas rockets aimed from the south, with much of the Middle East in tumult, and with Iran bent on nuclear arms, America's vocal and demonstrated commitment to the defense of Israel is even more critical. Whenever the security of Israel is most in doubt, America's commitment to Israel must be most secure.When the decision was before him in 1948, President Harry Truman decided without hesitation that the United States would be the first country to recognize the State of Israel. From that moment to this, we have been the most natural of allies, but our alliance runs deeper than the designs of strategy or the weighing of interests.The story of how America - a nation still so new to the world by the standards of this ancient region - rose up to become the dear friend of the people of Israel is among the finest and most hopeful in our nation's history.Different as our paths have been, we see the same qualities in one another. Israel and America are in many respects reflections of one another. We both believe in democracy, in the right of every people to select their leaders and choose their nation's course.We both believe in the rule of law, knowing that in its absence, willful men may incline to oppress the weak.We both believe that our rights are universal, granted not by government but by our Creator.We both believe in free enterprise, because it is the only economic system that has lifted people from poverty, created a large and enduring middle class, and inaugurated incomparable achievements and human flourishing.As someone who has spent most of his life in business, I am particularly impressed with Israel's cutting edge technologies and thriving economy. We recognize yours as the "start-up nation" - and the evidence is all around us.You have embraced economic liberty. You export technology, not tyranny or terrorism. And today, your innovators and entrepreneurs have made the desert bloom and have made for a better world. The citizens of our countries are fortunate to share in the rewards of economic freedom and in the creativity of our entrepreneurs. What you have built here, with your own hands, is a tribute to your people, and a model for others.Finally, we both believe in freedom of expression, because we are confident in our ideas and in the ability of men and women to think for themselves. We do not fear open debate. If you want to hear some very sharp criticisms of Israel and its policies, you don't have to cross any borders. All you have to do is walk down the street and into a café, where you'll hear people reasoning, arguing, and speaking their mind. Or pick up an Israeli newspaper - you'll find some of the toughest criticism of Israel you'll read anywhere. Your nation, like ours, is stronger for this energetic exchange of ideas and opinions.That is the way it is in a free society. There are many millions of people in the Middle East who would cherish the opportunity to do the same.These decent men and women desire nothing more than to live in peace and freedom and to have the opportunity to not only choose their government but to criticize it openly, without fear of repression or repercussion.I believe that those who oppose these fundamental rights are on the wrong side of history. But history's march can be ponderous and painfully slow. We have a duty to speed and shape history by being unapologetic ambassadors for the values we share.The United States and Israel have shown that we can build strong economies and strong militaries. But we must also build strong arguments that advance our values and promote peace. We must work together to change hearts and awaken minds through the power of freedom, free enterprise and human rights.I believe that the enduring alliance between the State of Israel and the United States of America is more than a strategic alliance: it is a force for good in the world. America's support of Israel should make every American proud. We should not allow the inevitable complexities of modern geopolitics to obscure fundamental touchstones. No country or organization or individual should ever doubt this basic truth: A free and strong America will always stand with a free and strong Israel.And standing by Israel does not mean with military and intelligence cooperation alone.We cannot stand silent as those who seek to undermine Israel, voice their criticisms. And we certainly should not join in that criticism. Diplomatic distance in public between our nations emboldens Israel's adversaries.By history and by conviction, our two countries are bound together. No individual, no nation, no world organization, will pry us apart. And as long as we stay together and stand together, there is no threat we cannot overcome and very little that we cannot achieve.Thank you all. May God bless America, and may He bless and protect the Nation of Israel.End TranscriptRomney mentions Tisha B'Av. Please read this concise article on Tisha B'Av and what it commemorates at Monkey in the Middle - It's excellent!Thanks to the SunTimes

Transcript: Kengor on Frank Marshall Davis, CPUSA'S Mentor of Obama

To contact us Click HERE

http://townhall.com/video/dinesh-dsouzas-new-film-reveals-obamas-ties-to-frank-marshall-davishttp://www.theblaze.com/stories/blaze-exclusive-see-this-clip-about-obamas-relationship-with-communist-frank-marshall-davis-from-dinesh-dsouzas-new-2016-film/
From the Blaze: 

Exclusive: See This Clip About Obama‘s Relationship WithCommunist Frank Marshall Davis From Dinesh D’Souza‘s ’2016 Film

Posted on July 12, 2012 at 8:12am by  Billy Hallowell Print »Email »
The Blaze has secured a second clip from the film. Ratherthan focusing upon Obama’s relationship with his brother, this exclusivefootage delves into the president’s kinship with avowed communist FrankMarshall Davis.
If you’re unfamiliar with this controversial figure,consider Dr. Paul G. Kengor, author of the upcoming Mercury Ink book aboutDavis called “The Communist,” and his recent Blaze contributor piece in whichhe further explains who he is. Kengor writes:
I know this area intimately well, given that my next book ison Obama’s mentor during those precise years: Frank Marshall Davis. I will nothere lay out the litany of Davis’s astonishing career, but, in essence, he wasa literal card-carrying member of Communist Party USA. For decades, he wrotethe most harsh, outlandish pro-Soviet material you can imagine, with his worstdemons being Democrats like Harry Truman and the men in Truman’sadministration—George Marshall among them—who opposed Stalin and the Kremlinduring the darkest days of the Cold War.
As I lay out in the book, Davis’s work was so bad that hewas called to testify on his “Soviet activities” by the Senate JudiciaryCommittee (run by Democrats), was carefully investigated by the FBI (Davis’sFBI file is 600 pages long), and, most remarkably, was placed on the federalgovernment’s Security Index—meaning that in the event of war breaking outbetween the United States and USSR, Davis could be immediately arrested.
And yet, this was the man that Obama’s grandfather, StanleyDunham, connected to a young Obama for the purpose of mentoring—preciselyduring these high school years.Frank Marshall Davis is another of those radicalassociations in Obama’s past. There are so many, and so unusually bad, thatObama, if he were a typical citizen, probably wouldn’t get a security clearancefor an entry-level government job.
 In the clip, D’Souza takes viewers through the intriguing — some wouldargue disturbing — relationship between Obama and Davis. In the footage,D’Souza speaks, in detail, with Kengor about this connection and attempts tobreak it down for viewers. (See original link above for video)
Watch it, below:
Barack's grandfather sought out a mentor for his grandson
Transcript:
D’Soua: He found an aging journalist and poet  named Frank Marshall Davis. The two becameclose over eight years until Obama left for college. I had the opportunity totalk to cold war historian Paul Kengor author of a book on Frank MarshallDavis.
D: What is the connection between Obama and Frank MarshallDavis?



Kengor: In Dreams of My Father he mentions Frank by name 22times. He never refers to him once as Frank Marshall Davis.
Why is that?
Frank Marshall Davis was a very controversial politicalfigure.  He wrote for a number ofpublications that even started in Chicago in the late 40s for a  communist party publication called TheChicago Star He did that for two years and then he moved on to Honolulu,Hawaii and there he wrote for a paper called the Honolulu record .If you read these columns they were so breathtakinglyanti-american . I found numerous comments over over and over again where heismocking and ridiculing the american way .

Stanley Dunham, the grandfather was also on the left . Obamahimself recalled how his grandfather and davis would get hammered drunk theywould spend hours together. He saw in davis a potential mentor , role model forBarack 

So Frank Marshall Davis was not some kind of a benign civilrights figure ?

Frank Marshall Davis was considered such a threat by the FBIthat they actually placed him on a federal government security index.  What that means is that  he was considered such a potential threat thatif a war ever broke out  between the USand the soviet union that Frank Marshall Davis could be  placed under immediate arrest .

Why has the media avoided reporting on th4e connectionbetween Davis and Obama?

Umm, it would have to. I mean if we ever had a president ofthe United States who was mentored by some meaningful degree by a literalpro-soviet pro-communist  card carryingmember of communist party USA card number 47544, that alone, the pro-Obama mediahas to ignore

And they’ll call me Joe McCarthy for even bothering to lookat it. (end)

Also of interest: http://www.akdart.com/obama1.htmlWhy Obama's radicalism matters:  According to his own narrative, Barack Obamawas bred by communists, raised by communists, mentored by communists and wasemployed by communists.  By hisadmission, he sought out communists as preferred parties with whom to fraternize.  Obama's radical Marxism is at the very coreof why he does what he does, why he will continue to do so and why Americaremains in dire peril with every day he occupies the White House.  Everything Obama has actualized or attempted— from his exploitation of high health-care costs to surreptitiouslycompromising the Constitution, to his desperation to regulate the Internet andany other means of public address into which he might conceivably insinuategovernment's putrid tentacles, to his proclivity for religious persecution, tohis spending us into destitution — have their roots in Marxist doctrine.

Frank Marshall Davis: Soviet Russia's Communist Revolutionary in Hawaii (Hawai'i Free Press)

To contact us Click HERE
Barack Obama Reading List:

By Andrew Walden :: 10785 Views

Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Barack Obama Reading List:
By Andrew Walden :: 10785 Views
 
Barack Obama: Born in Hawai`i
http://www.hawaiifreepress.com/main/ArticlesMain/tabid/56/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/92/Barack-Obama-Born-in-Hawaii.aspx
Barack Obama: Red Diaper Baby
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/10/barack_obama_red_diaper_baby_1.html
What Barack Obama learned from the Communist Party
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/07/what_barack_obama_learned_from.html
The Frank Marshall Davis network in Hawaii (Obama and the “revolution of 1954”)
http://www.aim.org/aim-column/the-frank-marshall-davis-network-in-hawaii
Obama’s Sex Rebel Communist mentor Frank Marshall Davis (Honolulu Record columnist)
http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/Rpt_Davis_Sex.pdf
Sex Rebel: Black (memoirs of a gash gourmet) by Obama mentor Frank Marshall Davis -- full text in pdf
https://secure.wikileaks.org/wiki/Image:SexRebelBlack.pdf

Obama’s Hawaii Democrat Party Connections
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/price_of_apology_clinton_obama
Lehman Bros: Obama’s Rezko-Auchi Conflict of Interest
http://www.hawaiifreepress.com/main/ArticlesMain/tabid/56/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/66/Lehman-Brothers-Obamarsquos-RezkoAuchi-conflict-of-interest.aspx
Obama’s Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac connection
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,423701,00.html
Obama Tries to stall Iraq withdrawal
http://www.hawaiifreepress.com/main/ArticlesMain/tabid/56/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/68/Obama-tries-to-stall-Iraq-withdrawal.aspx
Ayers: Obama’s ghostwriter?
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/10/who_wrote_dreams_from_my_fathe_1.html
Obama’s War
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/06/obamas_war.html
Obama's War on Black America
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/barack-obama%E2%80%99s-war-on-black-america/
Iraqi Billionaire threatens reporters investigating Obama-Rezko affair
http://www.aim.org/aim-column/iraqi-billionaire-threatens-reporters-investigating-rezko-affair



From the Frank Marshall Davis FBI files p. 15, this is the same "Frank" mentioned in "Dream from My Father" as the author's mentor
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34857706/Obama-Frank-Marshall-Davis-FBI-File
Davis never admitted openly that he was member of the communist party, but he told FBI informants that he was a member, and the FBI tagged him as a member of the party in Chicago from 1945 to 1948 before he moved to Hawaii. 

SAC, Honolulu August 15, 1962
Frank marshallDavis Security Matter
Reurlet 7-30-62. 
Subject is a  male, 56 year of age, who has been employed most of  this life as a reporter.He was a Communist Party (CP) member in Chicago from 1945 until 1948 when he moved to Hawaii. He was very active in the Party there until Party activity as such ceased in 1952. He was active in front groups in a leadership capacity until such front groups became inactive in 1956. when questioned before the Senate Internal Security Subcommitee  in 1956, Davis took the fifth amendment
He wrote a column which constantly followed the CP line  in the now defunct "Honolulu Record" until 1957. 
In 1958 he frequented the premises of this newspaper. He contributed to "The Worker" prior to 1956. 
He was listed as a sponsor for the 27th National Conference of the American Committee for Protection of Foreign Born in December, 1960.
In 1957 he championed the policies of Soviet Russia
His name is being retained on the Security Index at this time. 
Note on yellow: Relet recommended deletion from the SI.
The security index meant that Davis would have been arrested if war ever broke out with the Soviet Union. 

Israel's Heavy Armoured Personell Carriers As Tough as Tanks

To contact us Click HERE
One the first things that a military geek will tell somebody that calls an M113 a "tank" is that's an armoured personall carrier, it's doesn't have a big gun and isn't as heavily armoured as a tank. Except if it's one of these Israeli jobs which have to deal with palestinean nationalists and occasionally neighboring Arab states .

found this http://www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/israels-heavy-armored-personnel-carriers/

and pulled out these bits. Visit link for the whole thing. Seems they converted every tank they had except the Sherman and M-60


Israel’s Heavy Armored Personnel Carriers

Heavy metal

IDF heavy APCsFeatured Post
  • Written by: Mike Markowitz on August 1, 2012
  • Categories: Land Forces, Programs & Tech
  • Tags: Armored Fighting Vehicles, Foreign Military, Military News
  • Comments: No Comments

Share this Story

More »A column of IDF AFVs. The nearest vehicles are Puma combat engineering vehicles, the distant ones are Achzarit heavy APCs. Photo by merdiIDF's ZeldaThe IDF’s Combat Engineering Corps training aboard M113 “Zeldas.” The shortcomings of the M113 were one spur to the development of heavy armored personnel carriers. Israel Defense Forces photo



HALFTRACKS: The first APCs were “half-tracks,” basically trucks with rear axles replaced by caterpillar tracks. Their thin armor and lack of overhead protection led American GIs to call them “Purple Heart boxes.”Israel acquired 3,500 surplus half-tracks, using them in the 1956 and 1967 wars after most armies had upgraded to fully-enclosed boxes such as 
M113 GAVIN TRACKED BOX: the M113. Made of welded aluminum, the M113 could “swim” in water, propelled by its tracks. Aluminum armor kept out bullets and shell fragments, but was easily penetrated by rocket-propelled grenades (RPG) and anti-tank guided missiles (ATGM). The U.S. sent Israel over 6,000 M113s. They were nicknamed “Zelda,” Hebrew slang for an American Jewish girl. In the 1973 war, they suffered painful losses. REBUILT T-55 AchzaritAchzaritThe first of the IDF’s heavy armored personnel carriers, Achzarits were built from the captured hulls of Soviet-made T-54/55 tanks. Photo by gkirokI...Beginning in 1987, some 276 T-55s were rebuilt by removing the turret and constructing a compartment for 10 troops. The bulky Russian diesel engine was replaced by a compact power pack, leaving space for a passageway to a rear exit door. The exterior was covered with reactive armor that defeats RPGs and early ATGMs. Named Achzarit (“Cruel One”) the 48.5 ton vehicle carries four roof-mounted 7.62 mm machine guns.
REBUILT CENTURION: 

Nagmash’ot, Nagmachon, Nakpadon and Puma

NagmachonNagmachon heavy APC at the LIC 2004 exhibition. Derived from the British Centurion tank, this example has the distinctive “doghouse” replacing the turret. Photo by Fresh Military & Security Forum, Israel via MathKnightSimilar rebuilds gave new life to hundreds of obsolete IDF Centurion tanks. ...By the 1980s, as Centurions were replaced by new Israeli-designed Merkava tanks, they were rebuilt as infantry carriers. ... Some Nagmachons are fitted with a distinctive non-rotating “doghouse” studded with vision blocks for a forward observer.

Namer (Merkava)

Namer in USSoldiers from A Company, 1st Battalion, 29th Infantry Regiment, maneuver around an Israeli Namer during the Maneuver Battle Lab’s Ground Combat Vehicle assessment at Fort Bliss, Texas. The Namer was originally rebuilt from early Merkava tank chassis, but today they are being constructed by General Dynamics Land Systems in the United States. DoD photo by 1st Lt. Tyler N. GinterNamer means “tiger” or “leopard” in Hebrew.  Weighing 66 tons, this big cat is the most heavily armored APC ever built. About 130 are currently in service.  Early versions were converted surplus Merkava Mk. I tanks, but new production vehicles are assembled by General Dynamics in Lima, Ohio, and then shipped to Israel for installation of weapons and the secret composite and reactive armor.Namer carries a crew of 11: commander, driver, gunner and eight troops. The gunner’s remote-controlled weapon station can be fitted with a 7.62 mm or 12.7 mm machine gun, or 40 mm grenade launcher.  Four external video cameras provide 360-degree vision.Future versions will carry a 30 mm automatic cannon and the Rafael Trophy active protection system.  Namer is under evaluation for the U.S. Army’s Ground Combat Vehicleprogram.

27 Eylül 2012 Perşembe

Romney's Inspirational Jersualem Speech You'll Never Hear From Obama

To contact us Click HERE
Mitt Romney Jerusalem Speech Transcript 7-29-12
Maggie's Notebook ^ | 7-29-12 | Maggie@MaggiesNotebook 
Posted on Mon Jul 30 2012 14:40:16 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) by maggiesnotebookThe following is the transcript of a brilliant and inspiring speech by Mitt Romney from Jerusalem's Old City. I see only one word missing..."Palestinians," although they and the evil they perpetrate is clear. He reiterates that Jerusalem is the Capital City of Israel; that our ideals and values are much the same; that America will not stand by and watch horror played out again; that true peacemakers never allow despotic regimes to spread their hate to free peoples; that we have a solemn duty to believe Iran when they tell us they will destroy Israel [and the U.S.]; that the people of Israel are among our "dear friends," and that we both cherish free enterprise, and millions in the Middle East would cherish the same if they had the opportunity.He mentions the athletes and coaches who died in the 1972 Munich Olympic attack 40 years ago, by Palestinians known as Black September. Did you know that the day after those murders, the Olympics were shut down for that day and flags of all countries were flown at half mast - EXCEPT the flags of Arab countries, which continued to fly high with heinous pride?Barack Obama still has not set foot inside Israel during his Presidency. He has ushered Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in through a side door of the White House, walked out of White House meetings with him - leaving him and his staff in a Conference Room, and embraced nothing of Israel except his own false rhetoric. Obama has been to the Middle East numerous times - but never to Israel. UPDATE: Romney also made the point that an Islamist is now running Egypt. Two thumbs up for calling the ruler what he is.I urge all American Jews to vote for Mitt Romney, especially those of you in Florida, Ohio, Nevada and Pennsylvania. Get out the vote for him if you can. Donate to him if you can. [All emphasis in the text below is mine.]Pullout Quote:
By history and by conviction, our two countries are bound together. No individual, no nation, no world organization, will pry us apart. And as long as we stay together and stand together, there is no threat we cannot overcome and very little that we cannot achieve. ~ Mitt Romney in Israel 7-29-12
Begin transcript of Mitt Romney's speech in Jerusalem's Old City, July 29, 2012Thank you for that kind introduction, Mayor Barkat, and thank you all for that warm welcome. It's a pleasure and a privilege to be in Israel again.To step foot into Israel is to step foot into a nation that began with an ancient promise made in this land. The Jewish people persisted through one of the most monstrous crimes in human history, and now this nation has come to take its place among the most impressive democracies on earth. Israel's achievements are a wonder of the modern world.These achievements are a tribute to the resilience of the Israeli people. You have managed, against all odds, time and again throughout your history, to persevere, to rise up, and to emerge stronger.The historian Paul Johnson, writing on the 50th anniversary of the creation of the Jewish state, said that over the course of Israel's life, 100 completely new independent states had come into existence. "Israel is the only one whose creation can fairly be called a miracle," Johnson wrote.It is a deeply moving experience to be in Jerusalem, the capital of Israel.Our two nations are separated by more than 5,000 miles. But for an American abroad, you can't get much closer to the ideals and convictions of my own country than you do in Israel. We're part of the great fellowship of democracies. We speak the same language of freedom and justice, and the right of every person to live in peace. We serve the same cause and provoke the same hatreds in the same enemies of civilization.It is my firm conviction that the security of Israel is in the vital national security interest of the United States. And ours is an alliance based not only on shared interests but also on enduring shared values.In those shared values, one of the strongest voices is that of your prime minister, my friend Benjamin Netanyahu. I met with him earlier this morning and I look forward to my family joining his this evening as they observe the close of this fast day of Tisha B'Av.It's remarkable to consider how much adversity, over so great a span of time, is recalled by just one day on the calendar. This is a day of remembrance and mourning, but like other such occasions, it also calls forth clarity and resolve.At this time, we also remember the 11 Israeli athletes and coaches who were massacred at the Munich Olympics forty years ago. Ten years ago this week, 9 Israeli and American students were murdered in the terrorist attack at Hebrew University. And tragedies like these are not reserved to the past. They are a constant reminder of the reality of hate, and the will with which it is executed upon the innocent.It was Menachem Begin who said this about the Ninth of the month of Av: "We remember that day," he said, "and now have the responsibility to make sure that never again will our independence be destroyed and never again will the Jew become homeless or defenseless." "This," Prime Minister Begin added, "is the crux of the problems facing us in the future."So it is today, as Israel faces enemies who deny past crimes against the Jewish people and seek to commit new ones.When Iran's leaders deny the Holocaust or speak of wiping this nation off the map, only the naïve - or worse - will dismiss it as an excess of rhetoric. Make no mistake: the ayatollahs in Tehran are testing our moral defenses. They want to know who will object, and who will look the other way.My message to the people of Israel and the leaders of Iran is one and the same: I will not look away; and neither will my country. As Prime Minister Begin put it, in vivid and haunting words, "if an enemy of [the Jewish] people says he seeks to destroy us, believe him."We have seen the horrors of history. We will not stand by. We will not watch them play out again.It would be foolish not to take Iran's leaders at their word. They are, after all, the product of a radical theocracy.Over the years Iran has amassed a bloody and brutal record. It has seized embassies, targeted diplomats, and killed its own people. It supports the ruthless Assad regime in Syria. They have provided weapons that have killed American soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq. It has plotted to assassinate diplomats on American soil. It is Iran that is the leading state sponsor of terrorism and the most destabilizing nation in the world.We have a solemn duty and a moral imperative to deny Iran's leaders the means to follow through on their malevolent intentions.We should stand with all who would join our effort to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran - and that includes Iranian dissidents. Do not erase from your memory the scenes from three years ago, when that regime brought death to its own people as they rose up. The threat we face does not come from the Iranian people, but from the regime that oppresses them.Five years ago, at the Herzliya Conference, I stated my view that Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons capability presents an intolerable threat to Israel, to America, and to the world. That threat has only become worse.Now as then, the regime's claims that it seeks to enrich nuclear material for peaceful purposes are belied by years of malign deceptions.Now as then, the conduct of Iran's leaders gives us no reason to trust them with nuclear material.But today, the regime in Iran is five years closer to developing nuclear weapons capability. Preventing that outcome must be our highest national security priority. I want to pause on this last point. It is sometimes said that those who are the most committed to stopping the Iranian regime from securing nuclear weapons are reckless and provocative and inviting war.The opposite is true. We are the true peacemakers. History teaches with force and clarity that when the world's most despotic regimes secure the world's most destructive weapons, peace often gives way to oppression, to violence, or to devastating war.We must not delude ourselves into thinking that containment is an option. We must lead the effort to prevent Iran from building and possessing nuclear weapons capability. We should employ any and all measures to dissuade the Iranian regime from its nuclear course, and it is our fervent hope that diplomatic and economic measures will do so. In the final analysis, of course, no option should be excluded. We recognize Israel's right to defend itself, and that it is right for America to stand with you.These are some of the principles I first outlined five years ago. What was timely then has become urgent today.Let me turn from Iran to other nations in the Middle East, where we have seen rising tumult and chaos. To the north, Syria is on the brink of a civil war. The dictator in Damascus, no friend to Israel and no friend to America, slaughters his own people as he desperately clings to power.Your other neighbor to the north, Lebanon, is under the growing and dangerous influence of Hezbollah.After a year of upheaval and unrest, Egypt now has an Islamist President, chosen in a democratic election. Hopefully, this new government understands that one true measure of democracy is how those elected by the majority respect the rights of those in the minority. The international community must use its considerable influence to ensure that the new government honors the peace agreement with Israel that was signed by the government of Anwar Sadat.As you know only too well, since Hamas took control of the Gaza Strip in 2007, thousands of rockets have rained on Israeli homes and cities. I have walked on the streets of Sderot, and honor the resolve of its people. And now, new attacks have been launched from the Sinai Peninsula.With Hezbollah rockets aimed at Israel from the north, and Hamas rockets aimed from the south, with much of the Middle East in tumult, and with Iran bent on nuclear arms, America's vocal and demonstrated commitment to the defense of Israel is even more critical. Whenever the security of Israel is most in doubt, America's commitment to Israel must be most secure.When the decision was before him in 1948, President Harry Truman decided without hesitation that the United States would be the first country to recognize the State of Israel. From that moment to this, we have been the most natural of allies, but our alliance runs deeper than the designs of strategy or the weighing of interests.The story of how America - a nation still so new to the world by the standards of this ancient region - rose up to become the dear friend of the people of Israel is among the finest and most hopeful in our nation's history.Different as our paths have been, we see the same qualities in one another. Israel and America are in many respects reflections of one another. We both believe in democracy, in the right of every people to select their leaders and choose their nation's course.We both believe in the rule of law, knowing that in its absence, willful men may incline to oppress the weak.We both believe that our rights are universal, granted not by government but by our Creator.We both believe in free enterprise, because it is the only economic system that has lifted people from poverty, created a large and enduring middle class, and inaugurated incomparable achievements and human flourishing.As someone who has spent most of his life in business, I am particularly impressed with Israel's cutting edge technologies and thriving economy. We recognize yours as the "start-up nation" - and the evidence is all around us.You have embraced economic liberty. You export technology, not tyranny or terrorism. And today, your innovators and entrepreneurs have made the desert bloom and have made for a better world. The citizens of our countries are fortunate to share in the rewards of economic freedom and in the creativity of our entrepreneurs. What you have built here, with your own hands, is a tribute to your people, and a model for others.Finally, we both believe in freedom of expression, because we are confident in our ideas and in the ability of men and women to think for themselves. We do not fear open debate. If you want to hear some very sharp criticisms of Israel and its policies, you don't have to cross any borders. All you have to do is walk down the street and into a café, where you'll hear people reasoning, arguing, and speaking their mind. Or pick up an Israeli newspaper - you'll find some of the toughest criticism of Israel you'll read anywhere. Your nation, like ours, is stronger for this energetic exchange of ideas and opinions.That is the way it is in a free society. There are many millions of people in the Middle East who would cherish the opportunity to do the same.These decent men and women desire nothing more than to live in peace and freedom and to have the opportunity to not only choose their government but to criticize it openly, without fear of repression or repercussion.I believe that those who oppose these fundamental rights are on the wrong side of history. But history's march can be ponderous and painfully slow. We have a duty to speed and shape history by being unapologetic ambassadors for the values we share.The United States and Israel have shown that we can build strong economies and strong militaries. But we must also build strong arguments that advance our values and promote peace. We must work together to change hearts and awaken minds through the power of freedom, free enterprise and human rights.I believe that the enduring alliance between the State of Israel and the United States of America is more than a strategic alliance: it is a force for good in the world. America's support of Israel should make every American proud. We should not allow the inevitable complexities of modern geopolitics to obscure fundamental touchstones. No country or organization or individual should ever doubt this basic truth: A free and strong America will always stand with a free and strong Israel.And standing by Israel does not mean with military and intelligence cooperation alone.We cannot stand silent as those who seek to undermine Israel, voice their criticisms. And we certainly should not join in that criticism. Diplomatic distance in public between our nations emboldens Israel's adversaries.By history and by conviction, our two countries are bound together. No individual, no nation, no world organization, will pry us apart. And as long as we stay together and stand together, there is no threat we cannot overcome and very little that we cannot achieve.Thank you all. May God bless America, and may He bless and protect the Nation of Israel.End TranscriptRomney mentions Tisha B'Av. Please read this concise article on Tisha B'Av and what it commemorates at Monkey in the Middle - It's excellent!Thanks to the SunTimes